Can Structural Repairs Be Profitable?, Timothy W. Morgan, BodyShop Business, March
2001
The answer is up to you. With an accurate estimate, trained technicians and the proper procedures, you
can be sure those big hits don't become big losers.
Can structural repairs be profitable?
Do big hits have to be big money losers?
Shop managers and technicians ask these questions constantly. But what's the answer?
"Yes" for the first question. "No" for the second.
It's estimated that more than 70 percent of all repairs performed in a body shop today cost less than
$3,000. So the number of "big hits" rolling into your shop - and others across the country - isn't
as common as you may think. Though you probably don't see true big hits often, repairing the ones you do
come across can be profitable.
How? Let's start by looking at the current approach to structural repairs:
The vehicle enters your shop and you write an estimate. But where does your structural repair pricing
come from and how is it analyzed? Most shops currently use a "standard" mount and measure figure
that includes the basic setup, and then they use an additional figure for pulls. What does one pull amount
to? How about conjunctive pulls? All these are legitimate questions if you intend to make a profit on a big
hit.
Mounting: It's Not All Standard
Mounting the vehicle is the key to efficient repairs. If the vehicle is moving around the rack or bench,
the repair process is defeated. Not only are pulling angles affected by improper mounting, but the vehicle
structure itself can be jeopardized.
The problem is, mounting a vehicle can be a complex task. Rocker panel pinch-weld clamps aren't used on
all vehicles, and full-frame vehicles require specialized clamping to hold and support them. Specialized
clamping is also necessary to properly clamp BMW, Mercedes and other vehicle makes to avoid causing further
damage. All this means a "standard" mount - which is what you're charging for - isn't sufficient
for these vehicles.
Take Time to Measure
Is measuring the vehicle prior to repairs necessary? Ever heard the comment (or said it yourself),
"By the time I got the measuring system set up, I could've pulled the vehicle!"
This isn't a true statement by any means. Without a proper measuring system to diagnose the complete
vehicle, damage can go unnoticed. Plus, measuring during the repair with the proper measuring system and
data ensure final fit-up of exterior panels is kept to a minimum, which increases productivity. (Measuring
the upper body of the vehicle will also make repairs more efficient.)
Vehicle manufacturers require a 3-D measuring system to properly repair a vehicle to pre-accident
condition. But a 3-D measuring system requires some basic training to make it work properly and the repairs
more efficient - so owning one without learning how to use it won't improve productivity.
Pulling for You
How can pulling processes increase productivity? First, move as much damage out as possible at the same
time. Remember, it all went in at the same time! This is where conjunctive pulls come in. By pulling the
frame rail, the connected quarter panel begins to straighten at the same time, leaving a slight overlap in
repair times. Time calculation here can be a sticky situation, but proper identification of all the damage
at the time of the estimate can address this.
Computers to Guide Us
Can we improve current measuring processes and make structural repairs more profitable? Yes. And
computerized measuring can help with some of the time factors.
Think about how much time is wasted before finding structural damage during teardown. If a vehicle had
been measured during the estimating process, the whole repair process could change. Bottom line: Measure the
vehicle during the estimate. That way, additional damage can be identified and documented.
This process - if performed electronically - requires minimal time and improve your shop efficiency
level. Also, at the time of the estimate, you'll have a better understanding of structural repair needs and
be able to determine the classification of technician required to perform the repairs. A repair is so often
compromised because of lack of experience or knowledge by the technician. No more technicians in over their
heads. This process will allow for a better flow of repairs because of a better understanding of vehicle
condition.
Measuring a vehicle during the estimating process also means hidden damage, or inertia, becomes apparent
earlier in the process. Measurements can be taken from the basic center section and then a couple of points
in both the front and rear sections. This will provide enough information to set a repair process in motion.
So often, inertia damage isn't noted because measuring is focused on the obvious damage area and not the
opposite end of the vehicle. This hidden, indirect or secondary damage can add time and money to any repair.
But if it's addressed at the beginning of the repair, it can be corrected at the same time as other
procedures.
The computerized printout of measuring performed during the initial estimate is also the documentation
required to get proper payment for needed repairs. The proof is in the printout. Three millimeters can't
easily be seen by the naked eye but it's noticeable on a printout.
By performing a few preliminary steps up front, you can be more productive, and additional time necessary
to properly repair the vehicle can be initially added to the estimate rather than in a supplement.
No Time for Training?
Now let's look at actual repair technician efficiency. How often do technicians with little or no
training perform repairs that are "over their heads"? Too often, I've heard, "I can't afford
to have my technician out of the shop for two or more days of training."
Can't afford it? You can't afford not to send them for training. Improper repairs or improper usage of
equipment can be very costly. Technicians require training not only about repair processes, but about the
proper use of equipment. You surely didn't just get in a car on your 16th birthday and start driving down
the street without instruction. And as our labor pool shrinks more and more every year, the need for more
training increases.
The type of training can also be an issue. Is the provided information going to make the technician more
efficient? Are real-world repair issues being addressed? Repair theories are all fine and dandy, but the
training provided must increase productivity.
The Equipment Factor
Equipment used in the repair process can also hinder
productivity and profits. Though collision equipment manufacturers sometimes use different processes to
get to the final step, for the most part, the efficiency of equipment is proven by its design and the
vehicle data provided to repairers.
Cost shouldn't be the deciding factor of this major purchase. Each piece of equipment has proper uses and
abilities, and buying for price doesn't give you the best return on investment. The old saying "you get
what you pay for" is very applicable to this part of the repair process.
Going By the Book
Sometimes structural repairs can become subjective. Although there are proper processes in place by
vehicle manufacturers and equipment and training providers, too often judgment calls are made - ignoring
what's proper.
These judgment calls often start at the estimating process. Deciding whether to repair or replace should
be left to professionals, not newcomers. Also, sectioning of rails can be a sticky situation when OEM
information isn't available. At that point, procedures are available from research centers like I-CAR and
Tech-Cor. These operations have been developed through studies and actual testing, not by someone trying to
shortcut a repair because it's easier or faster. Also, it narrows the liability to the repairer and
facility.
When it comes to structural repairs, "seat of your pants" judgments are accidents waiting to
happen. Because there's no physical data to support reliability and crashworthiness, only perform proven
methods when making these types of repairs.
Let's look at a rail with an improper sectioning process performed: